<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: That Chinese sub story</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onefinemess.rhinopanda.net/2007/11/28/that-chinese-sub-story/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onefinemess.rhinopanda.net/2007/11/28/that-chinese-sub-story/</link>
	<description>The blog formerly known as Onefinemess.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:45:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bethany Morrow</title>
		<link>http://onefinemess.rhinopanda.net/2007/11/28/that-chinese-sub-story/#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>Bethany Morrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 20:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onefinemess.wordpress.com/2007/11/29/that-chinese-sub-story/#comment-219</guid>
		<description>No, they&#039;re not planning on leaving. As in that&#039;s their home. Lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, they&#8217;re not planning on leaving. As in that&#8217;s their home. Lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://onefinemess.rhinopanda.net/2007/11/28/that-chinese-sub-story/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 15:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onefinemess.wordpress.com/2007/11/29/that-chinese-sub-story/#comment-218</guid>
		<description>HMm, you can still get out of there now I think.  The way these things pan out it could be years before tensions really kick in.

And who knows, maybe the next pres will somehow magically pay off our debt to China, then get some juevos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HMm, you can still get out of there now I think.  The way these things pan out it could be years before tensions really kick in.</p>
<p>And who knows, maybe the next pres will somehow magically pay off our debt to China, then get some juevos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bethany Morrow</title>
		<link>http://onefinemess.rhinopanda.net/2007/11/28/that-chinese-sub-story/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>Bethany Morrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 04:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onefinemess.wordpress.com/2007/11/29/that-chinese-sub-story/#comment-217</guid>
		<description>I just read an article about a Texas family who moved to China to help abandoned kids and have been there for seven years. Don&#039;t think they&#039;re coming back. I just hate when tensions affect people trying to make their lives in other countries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read an article about a Texas family who moved to China to help abandoned kids and have been there for seven years. Don&#8217;t think they&#8217;re coming back. I just hate when tensions affect people trying to make their lives in other countries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://onefinemess.rhinopanda.net/2007/11/28/that-chinese-sub-story/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 16:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onefinemess.wordpress.com/2007/11/29/that-chinese-sub-story/#comment-216</guid>
		<description>I have often wondered about the bizarre stories placed side by side in British papers.

I don&#039;t think this one was made up though, as it was covered elsewhere (albeit spottily), that was just the first search result I got.

And we&#039;re not going to bomb China, I&#039;d bet money on that.  They can cause more damage to us financially than we could to them short of nuking, which of course we wouldn&#039;t do (and besides they&#039;d nuke us back and it would be MAD all over again...like I said, hello cold war II!  I suspect we&#039;re in the midst of it already).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have often wondered about the bizarre stories placed side by side in British papers.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think this one was made up though, as it was covered elsewhere (albeit spottily), that was just the first search result I got.</p>
<p>And we&#8217;re not going to bomb China, I&#8217;d bet money on that.  They can cause more damage to us financially than we could to them short of nuking, which of course we wouldn&#8217;t do (and besides they&#8217;d nuke us back and it would be MAD all over again&#8230;like I said, hello cold war II!  I suspect we&#8217;re in the midst of it already).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bethany Morrow</title>
		<link>http://onefinemess.rhinopanda.net/2007/11/28/that-chinese-sub-story/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>Bethany Morrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onefinemess.wordpress.com/2007/11/29/that-chinese-sub-story/#comment-215</guid>
		<description>First things first, did you see the other stories alongside this one in the daily? Yeah. I love how indiscriminately the UK papers post gossip and &quot;real&quot; news. I&#039;m surprised they weren&#039;t sharing the banner headline. Secondly, I&#039;ll give them the benefit of the doubt that the Daily didn&#039;t just make it up like the rest of the tabloid trash they publsih. Thirdly, maybe we haven&#039;t heard about it yet because we haven&#039;t retaliated yet. They&#039;re supposed to just get on the news and be like, &quot;and boy were our faces &lt;b&gt;red&lt;/b&gt;!&quot;?? Not likely. Two months from now, when we&#039;ve bombed them several times and gotten our anticipated cry of &quot;Uncle&quot;, it&#039;ll be all over MSNBC, finally taking the place of that new Peterson cop who kills his wives. Enjoy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First things first, did you see the other stories alongside this one in the daily? Yeah. I love how indiscriminately the UK papers post gossip and &#8220;real&#8221; news. I&#8217;m surprised they weren&#8217;t sharing the banner headline. Secondly, I&#8217;ll give them the benefit of the doubt that the Daily didn&#8217;t just make it up like the rest of the tabloid trash they publsih. Thirdly, maybe we haven&#8217;t heard about it yet because we haven&#8217;t retaliated yet. They&#8217;re supposed to just get on the news and be like, &#8220;and boy were our faces <b>red</b>!&#8221;?? Not likely. Two months from now, when we&#8217;ve bombed them several times and gotten our anticipated cry of &#8220;Uncle&#8221;, it&#8217;ll be all over MSNBC, finally taking the place of that new Peterson cop who kills his wives. Enjoy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

